Salaam Alaykum Everyone.. I know its been a while since my last post. Somehow I wasn't able to come across any good material to post till today. I hope you enjoy it and learn from it as I did. Its an article printed in The News Daily, in their weekly Iqra section.

Modernism in Islam
By Jamaluddin Zarabozo

We can relate, ideologically, the modernist movement spreading these days to one sect in the past. This sect is called the "Mu’tazila", which is dated back to the third Islamic century. Although those people accepted the Holy Qur’aan and Sunnah but they made their own interpretation of the Holy Qur’aan and said that ‘aql’ (intelligence) takes precedence over ‘naql’ (guidance of the Holy Qur’aan and the Holy Prophet [Sall Allaho alaihe wasallam]). However, this school died out. The modernist movement did not evolve from them, but they are very similar to them. The modernist movement actually originated in Europe in the middle ages. At the time when the scientific method came about in Spain, it was seen that what the church was teaching was not true. This led to a slow revolt. The basic view of modernism — in all religions — is that: the religion should change according to the circumstances, and that it is not fixed. There is no such thing as absolute truth.
The Jewish and Christian modernist response in Europe tried to explain how the religion was still relevant for the people. They made innovations to keep people interested in the religion (such as singing in church, introduced only in the 1900’s). They tried to say the divine and the human is mixed in the Bible and that the parts that are true must be the ones that are not out-of-date.
Also, the religion is improving over time and there is no absolute truth in the Bible. This is the time in history when many Muslims were looking to Europe. This led to three choices for those Muslims: accept the West; reject the West; or mix the two (reform Islam). Those who followed the third (the modernist) developed in, and focused on Turkey — because it was under British influence; and Egypt — because Al-Azhar was the seat of Islamic knowledge. The people of this modernist movement judge Islam according to their ‘aql. Some of their faults in regards to it are:
1. Use it for things, which it can’t comprehend;
2. Refer everything to it: accept what agrees with it, reject what does not;
3. Judge the revelation by it.
However, Ahl As-Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ believes that using the sound ‘aql should lead one to the conclusion that the Holy Qur’aan and the Holy Prophet (Sall Allaho alaihe wasallam) are true and that their teachings should take precedence over pure ‘aql.
The influence of modernism in US:
Modernists are saying that the West and the world have changed, and that Islam must become "civilised". Modernism has spread the most in the US because:
1. There are no scholars available to refute them, or they won’t refute them because people don’t want to criticise them;
2. It allows Muslims from overseas to become part of American society and they do not have to be recognised as Muslim. Also, new American Muslims will not have to change their old lifestyle;
3. Much of the literature, scholars, and institutions in the US reflect the modernist thinking.
In tafseer, Yusuf Ali is the most popular translator of the meaning of the Holy Qur’aan, even though he denies what the ‘aql can’t see (of the unseen). In Seerah, one book is saying the Holy Prophet (Sall Allaho alaihe wasallam) is like anyone else. Another tries to say the Sunnah is not for the Shari’ah and that sometimes we have to throw away the Hadith because Allah did not correct the Prophet’s mistakes when he made ‘ijtihaad’. In Fiqh, modernists say interest is permissible, menstruation women can pray, and Muslim women can marry non-Muslim men. They say the face of women was not covered until 150 years after the time of the Holy Prophet (Sall Allaho alaihe wasallam), even though it existed in his time, and that women should always pray in the mosque, even though Hadith only show women in the mosque at Ishaa and Fajr because they could not be recognised in the dark. They also say the Hadith that a people with a woman ruler will not succeed is not true today and polygamy is forbidden except under certain conditions (which do not exist).
Finally, it should be mentioned that this movement is organised and has resources, such as magazines, television, conventions, and literature.
Some of their views:
Modernists influence the thinking of people, and that person spreads their views on unknowingly. Their way of thinking is the most dangerous thing about them. None discuss belief because it is not important to them (‘aql judges naql). They are also trying to remove the Sunnah and say that the system of the old muhadditheen (learned scholars of Hadith) is insufficient. Most say (as do critics of the Bible) that we need a "higher criticism" of Hadith and the earlier conclusions (ijmaa) of scholars are not sufficient, yet they give no new way to judge Hadith.
However, we as Muslims understand that the Holy Prophet (Sall Allaho alaihe wasallam) was guided by Allah and that we may not be able to understand everything in the Hadith with our ‘aql. It is common for the modernists to question the role of the Sunnah in the Shari’ah. One said all of the Sunnah is of this world and not religion, even in the Prophet’s time, therefore, it is all a matter of shoora (consultation) and ijtihaad (therefore changeable).
Another says we need to make ijtihaad for what is to be followed, and changes of time and place make Sunnah difficult to use. All of this is mentioned to weaken the view of the Sunnah. The Jews and Christians tried to differ the human from the divine. Modernists try to point out the differences between the Messenger (Sall Allaho alaihe wasallam) as a human and as a Prophet. They also avoid following the Sunnah by dividing his life into parts (Imam, judge, military leader, prophet, etc), saying some are not divine teachings and not law. Some say everyone is free to make ijtihaad, and later restrictions on it were imposed by the people. Another said a ruling may change even if it is from the Holy Qur’aan and Sunnah.
How do modernists go astray?
The observer can easily point out the following points as the driving force for this trend:
1. Their premises and assumptions are wrong. Modernists look to the West and try to reinterpret the "old religion" with modern science and modern times. They assume that:
a) the present situation is advanced or different (ie "this is not the Prophet’s time!"). However, the idea of progress and that things are better now is Marxian and Hegelian. It is against the Hadith, as the Holy Prophet (Sall Allaho alaihe wasallam) said each generation is getting worse. They must prove that there has been progression (no definition of it given). Islamically the advanced society is the one that comes closer to Allah, and understands and applies Islam better (such as the Sahabah). In fact, the current societies have the things of the old societies (such as homosexuality, etc) as mentioned in the Holy Qur’aan;
b) religion is relative to time and place (ie "therefore we need to judge Islam in the light of modern science"). Modernists are "people of science" and judge Islam according to modern science. They think that the West is based on science, but they fail to notice that not all science is based on fact. In reality, much of science is only hypothesis (not a fact). Also, every science has its own philosophy, which will lead to its own conclusions;
c) the way of thinking of a society is based on (is a product of) its environment. Modernists say most of religion is from the people and their environment and it can be judged by later times, and Hadith are related to that time only. However, there is no proof for the modernist hypothesis that religious truth is relative. Allah says the Holy Qur’aan is the truth. Modernists are saying (by inference) that if the Holy Qur’aan is not true now, then it was never true.
2. The methodology they use is wrong. The methodology of the modernists is the way they mislead people to the wrong conclusions. They claim to be scientific, but they are usually inconsistent or have no proof or foundation for their beliefs. Some of the means and principles they use include:
a) Sunnah and Hadith. They claim the Holy Qur’aan is authentic and they only follow "authentic" Hadith. This implies that they have a way to judge Hadith (different from that of the traditional scholars), yet most give no new way to judge Hadith, and are using their ‘aql (intelligence) to determine this (like the female ruler Hadith). Modernists especially dislike Hadith, which have specific meanings and prefer ones, which only have general principles.
b) Use of weak Hadith to help their points and arguments (while they are calling for the use of authentic Hadith). For example, in the area of women in Islam (the two areas the modernists try to change the most are the Sunnah and women) they like to quote two stories from the time of Hadhrat Umar (Radhi Allaho anho): 1) when Umar (Radhi Allaho anho) was delivering a sermon, he tried to restrict the amount of dowry, a woman opposed, and he corrected himself and thanked the woman, and 2) Umar (Radhi Allaho anho) appointed Umm-e-Shifaa as a market-regulator (used by modernist to say women can work in the government). However, both of these stories are not authentic.
C) Use vague terms without defining them. Modernists use terms like democracy, freedom, and equality, but they do not define what they mean by them. The danger in using vague terms is that a knowledgeable person will pass over the word or concept, thinking they meant the Islamic or acceptable definition while in fact they did not, while others may believe what they are saying is true.
d) Do not present all of the relevant information that is available on the subject. That is, from the Holy Qur’aan, Sunnah, etc. They only present that which will support their views. This tactic is used to avoid unliked beliefs, so they just do not mention them.
e) Force their interpretation onto the text. This is what the Muta’zilla did, when they said ‘aql takes precedence over what is from the Holy Prophet (Sall Allaho alaihe wasallam). Many modernists say Islam is the "rational" religion. This is true if you mean everything is from Allah and there is no contradiction, but to say that we can study everything in Islam by judging it with only our intellect is unacceptable and there is also no proof for this. To avoid implementing what the Holy Qur’aan and Sunnah says, the modernists say we need to follow the "spirit" of Islam and not worry about the laws specifically. But it is clear from the Holy Qur’aan and Sunnah that we are to take both. They will argue that the text of the Holy Qur’aan only says for women to dress modestly and they do not like to talk about the specific details of Hijab and say we only need to follow the "spirit" of the law.
f) They tend to oppose scholars by saying they meant something else. They say that the door to ijtihaad is open, which is something accepted by the Ahl As-Sunnah Wal Jamaa’. However, it is not open to everybody on any subject. Modernists claim that anyone would make ijtihaad until Imam Shaffie narrowed the qualifications (which is not true), and today anyone can do it. In one magazine, on the question of polygamy and divorce, some said that these two can be restricted by ijtihaad. They often misquote scholars and give their own meanings for what they said.
g) Often follow strange and rejected opinions. They try to revive some of the old opinions because they like it and say that this writer said it in the past. Modernists try to open the door to these opinions and choose what is the most suitable and easy to follow. However, we are supposed to look for the fiqh opinions that are the closest to the truth.
h) Follow their desires. They often make rulings and fatawa without permissible evidence. One said that music is permissible because he did not see something wrong with it, so it is Halal. But he did not check what the Holy Qur’aan and the Sunnah say about this subject.
Islam and modernism:
Ahl As-Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ believes that there is only one true Islam. This is proven in the Holy Qur’aan and Hadith. One Hadith shows the straight line as leading to Allah, and branching paths leading off it with a devil at each one calling to it. Also, the Ummah will break into 73 sects, and the true way is the one who follows Prophet Muhammad (Sall Allaho alaihe wasallam) and his companions. Modernists are differing from Ahl As-Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ in:
1) everything in accordance with the Holy Qur’aan and Sunnah is the truth and what disagrees with it is false (some modernists disagree with this). Also, statements consistent with the Holy Qur’aan and Sunnah are accepted;
2) Ijmaa (consensus) of the Sahabah (and early generations) is a proof for all Muslims. Modernists say the Sahabah are men and we are men, and even matters agreed on by them are open to ijtihaad;
3) anything in the Holy Qur’aan and Sunnah cannot be opposed by ‘aql, rational thought, opinion, or qiyas. This is supported in the Holy Qur’aan and is not open to discussion or vote. One modernist said the amputation of the hand of the thief is a "Khomeni Islam" and is unethical;
4) there are constants in Islam related to belief, worship, etc and these are good, sound, proper, and correct for all places and times. This view is accepted by the Ahl as-Sunnah, but not by many of the modernists, saying that all truth is relative and there is no constants. However, these constant principles are basic aspects of the Ahl as-Sunnah and are traced to the Holy Qur’aan and Sunnah and Sahabah. They are not questionable or changeable things. In many of these things, modernists say we need ijtihaad and revival.
Dangers:
1) Many are influenced by it and do not know it. Also, their views are unacceptable and should be refuted.
2) Many people do not recognise it as a movement of rejection and refutation, so they try to defend it.